Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Dec 01, 2014
  2. Jul 20, 2014
  3. Jul 23, 2014
  4. Jul 20, 2014
  5. Jul 28, 2014
  6. Jul 27, 2014
  7. Jul 09, 2014
  8. Apr 24, 2014
    • Alain Leufroy's avatar
      [stcheck] fix visit_constant checker: a etype inside a CAST is a good thing · dbb9798ea5ad
      Alain Leufroy authored
      Actually, if you put a CAST after a relation (!= ``is`` or ``is_instance_of``),
      the checker raises an error saying that the etype (inside the CAST) must be
      after a ``is`` or ``is_instance_of`` relation. In fact the CAST case was tested too late.
      
      This allow to use CAST outside the selection section, so:
      Closes #79232
      dbb9798ea5ad
  9. Jun 06, 2014
  10. Jun 04, 2014
  11. Apr 23, 2014
  12. May 12, 2014
  13. Jun 06, 2014
  14. Mar 13, 2014
  15. Mar 11, 2014
  16. Dec 16, 2013
  17. Oct 21, 2013
  18. Oct 23, 2013
  19. Sep 11, 2013
  20. Aug 28, 2013
  21. Aug 08, 2013
  22. Jun 28, 2013
  23. Aug 07, 2013
  24. Aug 02, 2013
  25. May 15, 2013
    • Adrien Di Mascio's avatar
      fix add_type_restriction() implementation with IN() function (closes #138635) · 3e6b5f8cc4d2
      Adrien Di Mascio authored
      When the variable type is defined by an IN() function, ``add_type_restriction``
      removes all types in it that don't match the specified type. Since the list
      of types is modified inplace, the iteration must be done on a copy, not on
      the list itself.
      
      There was a test for "add_type_restriction + IN()" case but since there
      was only 2 types defined in the IN function, the problem was not exposed.
      3e6b5f8cc4d2
  26. Apr 10, 2013
  27. Apr 08, 2013
Loading