Should we rename @logilab/cwclientlibjs into @cubicweb/client ?
The advantage I see with the @cubicweb scope:
-
@logilab/cwclientlibjsis not as clear as@cubicweb/clientand it contains two acronyms. - in V2 with #4 client codes will have to import files using their full path in order to avoid including the whole library,
@cubicweb/client/EntityProviderwould be shorter to type than@logilab/cwclientlibjs/EntityProvider - we could put the existing cli into a
@cubicweb/clipackage (versus@logilab/cwcli) and cwelements into@cubicweb/elements(versus@logilab/cwelements)
What do you think about that @ethieblin, @famarger, @gvandevelde ?
This would have the side effect of removing the "Logilab" brand from the scope so I think that @nchauvat should take the final decision.
I also think that we should move this project to the https://forge.extranet.logilab.fr/cubicweb group
To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have an admin enable hashed storage. More information