Should we rename @logilab/cwclientlibjs into @cubicweb/client ?
The advantage I see with the @cubicweb
scope:
-
@logilab/cwclientlibjs
is not as clear as@cubicweb/client
and it contains two acronyms. - in V2 with #4 (closed) client codes will have to import files using their full path in order to avoid including the whole library,
@cubicweb/client/EntityProvider
would be shorter to type than@logilab/cwclientlibjs/EntityProvider
- we could put the existing cli into a
@cubicweb/cli
package (versus@logilab/cwcli
) and cwelements into@cubicweb/elements
(versus@logilab/cwelements
)
What do you think about that @ethieblin, @famarger, @gvandevelde ?
This would have the side effect of removing the "Logilab" brand from the scope so I think that @nchauvat should take the final decision.
I also think that we should move this project to the https://forge.extranet.logilab.fr/cubicweb group