Should we rename @logilab/cwclientlibjs into @cubicweb/client ?

The advantage I see with the @cubicweb scope:

• @logilab/cwclientlibjs is not as clear as @cubicweb/client and it contains two acronyms.
• in V2 with #4 (closed) client codes will have to import files using their full path in order to avoid including the whole library, @cubicweb/client/EntityProvider would be shorter to type than @logilab/cwclientlibjs/EntityProvider
• we could put the existing cli into a @cubicweb/cli package (versus @logilab/cwcli) and cwelements into @cubicweb/elements (versus @logilab/cwelements)

What do you think about that @ethieblin, @famarger, @gvandevelde ?

This would have the side effect of removing the "Logilab" brand from the scope so I think that @nchauvat should take the final decision.

I also think that we should move this project to the https://forge.extranet.logilab.fr/cubicweb group