1. 09 Oct, 2015 1 commit
  2. 08 Oct, 2015 4 commits
  3. 06 Oct, 2015 2 commits
  4. 05 Oct, 2015 1 commit
  5. 23 Sep, 2015 2 commits
    • Julien Cristau's avatar
      [hooks/syncschema] make sure CWUniqueTogetherConstraintDelOp happens before CWConstraintDelOp · 22f330f829ae
      Julien Cristau authored
      SQLServer refuses to index an unlimited text column, so we should drop
      unique_together constraints (which imply an index) before we drop size
      constraints.  Closes #5560601.
      22f330f829ae
    • Aurelien Campeas's avatar
      [hooks/syncschema] only call "ALTER TABLE" once when changing a size constraint · 80236876ee4d
      Aurelien Campeas authored
      Until now we would:
      
      - remove the old size constraint from the in-memory schema
      - call update_rdef_column which removes the size restriction from the
        column's type
      - add the new constraint object
      - call update_rdef_column which adds the size restriction back
      
      This breaks on SQL Server when the column is involved in an index (e.g.
      as part of a multi-column unique constraint), because in the
      intermediate stage the column's type is "nvarchar(max)", which is not
      indexable.
      
      Of course we must still detect the case where a size constraint is
      really dropped and update the db schema accordingly.
      
      Closes #5557633.
      80236876ee4d
  6. 09 Sep, 2015 1 commit
    • Sylvain Thénault's avatar
      [autoform] fix appearance of link to add inlined creation form · a8b33789b982
      Sylvain Thénault authored
      
      On entity creation, if there are some local permissions on the relation,
      we have no way of checking them since neither the subject nor the object
      of the relation exists yet. In such a case, we should add the link by
      default, for consistency (see other places where we use
      `may_have_permission`).
      
      Closes #6711900
      a8b33789b982
  7. 08 Oct, 2015 2 commits
  8. 02 Sep, 2015 1 commit
  9. 07 Oct, 2015 1 commit
  10. 02 Sep, 2015 1 commit
  11. 25 Aug, 2015 1 commit
  12. 21 Aug, 2015 1 commit
  13. 21 Jul, 2015 2 commits
  14. 09 Jul, 2015 2 commits
  15. 19 Jun, 2015 2 commits
  16. 18 Jun, 2015 1 commit
  17. 08 Apr, 2015 1 commit
  18. 02 Jul, 2015 1 commit
  19. 11 Jun, 2015 1 commit
  20. 27 Mar, 2015 3 commits
  21. 18 Mar, 2015 1 commit
  22. 17 Mar, 2015 1 commit
  23. 18 Mar, 2015 3 commits
  24. 17 Mar, 2015 1 commit
  25. 13 Mar, 2015 1 commit
    • Denis Laxalde's avatar
      [web/views/rdf] Take the second element of XY equivalent for non final relation · a12e4459eee5
      Denis Laxalde authored
      When given a Yams snippet of the form `<etype> <rtype>` ``xy.xeq()`` will
      return the XML snippet equivalent to this relation in the form of a tuple
      `(subject, rtype, object)` so ``item`` will always be a tuple here.
      
      In fact, the correct code appears just a few lines above (around line 88) for
      final relations so I guess this is a copy-paste mistake.
      
      Closes #4745929.
      a12e4459eee5
  26. 11 Feb, 2015 1 commit
  27. 09 Mar, 2015 1 commit